A victory for state sanctioned and engineered bullying and intimidation

Following on from the BBC-enabled Margaret Hodge hypocrisy fest on the Today programme this morning…

American citizen Sam Bloggs, who when in Europe is resident in the Netherlands and pays tax on his earnings in full there, has told the UK government he is going to voluntarily pay more tax to the Exchequer than required by law, following a sustained campaign by his neighbours who argue that because he has a lot of money and he should pay more here.

Bloggs had followed the letter of the law enabling free movement of trade and capital in the EU after taking advice from taxation specialists.  But following his hard work and success in building up his worldwide franchise business, which indirectly employs a large number of people and contributes a substantial sum in tax and National Insurance to this country’s coffers, he was subjected to an onslaught of vilification in the media and even in Parliament.  Bloggs told AM:

My business model has helped create companies, wealth and jobs, generated substantial tax income and contributed a great deal through National Insurance in the UK. I give money and time to charity, working with the Fairtrade Foundation and supporting the Prince’s Trust through a partnership agreement even though I’m not based in Britain.

But because I’ve been fortunate enough to be successful a number of people and politicians have demanded I pay more than the rules say I am obligated to. They say it’s not fair that I’ve been successful and earned a lot of money and pay full tax in Holland instead of here.  Because I’ve earned it and got it they say fairness dictates they should have it instead.  They say they want it and they make the rules so therefore they’re entitled to it.

It means I’ll have less money to invest in creating more opportunities and supporting charity, but if I don’t make these additional payments some people are going to keep smearing me and telling people to boycott my brand.

State sanctioned and engineered bullying and intimidation has won the day for the feckless incompetents.  When will people wake up and say enough is enough?

Those who fritter away our money – not just on deserving vulnerable people in our society in need of support – on those who think they have a right to be kept in return for nothing, on those who come to this country to take advantage of the enhanced suite of benefits and services they have never contributed a penny to, and worst of all on massive handouts to the establishment’s friends who farm taxpayer subsidies for all manner of wheezes on an industrial scale to boost their already substantial wealth, are demanding even more money with menaces while hoodwinking the unthinking into applying the necessary pressure to make it possible.

The pressure to fork over ever more money to the government is not just being applied to the likes of Starbucks and Amazon.  Via the spiteful tactics of HMRC conducted outside the view of the public, it’s happening to small businessmen too, driving some out of business altogether.  And the state calls this ‘fair’.  Bollocks!

5 Responses to “A victory for state sanctioned and engineered bullying and intimidation”

  1. 1 Oldrightie (@OldRightie) 03/12/2012 at 11:02 am

    The socialist politics of envy in the raw. Embraced by all three parties who hold sway.

  2. 2 james higham 03/12/2012 at 12:19 pm

    Just had a personal example of it this morning. Told ’em where they could put it.

  3. 3 Autonomous Mind 03/12/2012 at 12:39 pm

    What happened James? (If you are able to tell us)

  4. 4 Steve 03/12/2012 at 1:53 pm

    A pittance on a few feel-good initiatives such as Princes Trust does not really cut the mustard, particularly when the “business model” effectively sucks out the life from any alternative entrepreneurial initiative and spirit others may have by unfairly undermining and undercutting them.

    For example, are you aware that big companies in service industries can very effectively avoid national insurance. Such businesses can effectively be run with large numbers of people on 15 hour contracts. 15 hours at minimum wage will require neither employer or employee to pay NI. Employee will (unless they are able to find a second job) qualify for various benefits. The local grocer, newsagent, coffee shop, sweet shop, with 1 or 2 staff members won’t be able to use this tactic as easily as the Big Business Benefit Scroungers.

    Let’s not be naive here. For big businesses and rich people we all know that tax payments have always involved elements of negotiation with those in power. So prissy statements that they are following “the letter of the law” are irrelevant. If those in power can get power to their elbow from organisations such as UK Uncut or 38 Degrees, the letter of the law has a chance of coming more into line with giving local businesses and local people a *fair* playing field.

  5. 5 Andy Baxter 03/12/2012 at 3:06 pm

    I’ve had two alleged parking traffic violations come throught he post last week: legalised theft by any measure

    I sent them back stating

    “I recall signing no such contract”

    I shall await the proverbial court summons then ‘tie them up’ linguistically in court by behaving in a ‘sovereign’ fashion: not the Roger Hayes wayof confrontation but much more subtle, my way….

    any and all are welcome to come spectate as this is the way I aim to train all us Harrogaters to deal with TPTB once we decide to become civilly disobedient in sufficient numbers and say “NO”

Comments are currently closed.

Enter your email address below

The Harrogate Agenda Explained

Email AM

Bloggers for an Independent UK

AM on Twitter

Error: Please make sure the Twitter account is public.

STOR Scandal

Autonomous Mind Archive

%d bloggers like this: