Here’s one in the eye for David Cameron, Boris Johnson, Open Europe, the Daily Mail, Telegraph and a host of other EUphile fantasists who keep presenting the British people with a fake and non-existant option of renegotiating a ‘looser relationship’ with the EU…
We have been saying this for years. Now the EU home affairs commissioner, Cecilia Malmström, has reminded the Tory fronts that other EU states would be able to block the UK from accessing the powers it might choose to opt back in to, a clear diplomatic message that power has been ceded to the EU and it will decide what goes. Malmström is quoted in the Financial Times:
“Negotiations haven’t started yet as we don’t know what the UK wants to opt out of but, of course, we will have to analyse their choices with our legal experts because, of these 136 laws, many are very connected.”
In typical Tory fashion, denial was the immediate response. With clear parallels to the false statements from the government about Starbucks and the tax rules it should be following, Tory MP, Dominic Raab, said Britain had “every right” to cherry-pick which laws it wanted:
“The commissioner is quite wrong to insist we give Brussels democratic control in order to engage in operational law enforcement co-operation,” the MP added. “It is that kind of arrogance that corrodes public confidence in the EU.”
The problem for Raab is that Brussels already has control. The UK signed a variety of treaties against the wishes of the British people and it is another fairytale for Raab to pretend the UK has control in areas it has given up. In the same way Danny Alexander is trying to channel public anger at Starbucks for acting lawfully and within the rules, because he doesn’t like the outcome, Raab is trying to shift the public focus on the EU acting lawfully and within the rules the UK political class agreed to, because he doesn’t like the outcome.
As Malmström has explained, any decision concerning the UK’s opt-in choices would not be up to her but would have to be agreed by all other member states. Them’s the rules, whether Raab, Cameron, Johnson, Open Europe et al like it or not. Those are the treaties they have to accept to remain members of the EU.
The only reality is this, if the UK wants to determine laws and regulations for itself then it needs to be a sovereign, independent nation state. It is not, and never can be all the while it remains a member of the EU. Membership is incompatible with the vision Cameron & co are painting, and their vision is not possible within the structures they are determined to remain a part of.
Solution? Invoke Article 50 by stating the UK intends to leave the EU. The UK would regain full control of its ow affairs, while forcing the EU to the negotiating table to thrash out agreements on free trade, movement of people and capital and the other matters essential to protecting our economic interests.
I am unable to fathom why we need to remain part of something having more lasting damage to our Nation than two world wars.
OldRightie: because the ‘political class’ the ‘few’ who order and feel endowed with teh divine right sense of entitlement to do so deem such. The Harrogate Agenda offers us an alternative, namely to shift power back to ‘us’ where it belongs.
it’s the only way………
http://www.eureferendum.com/blogview.aspx?blogno=83181
The only time the LibLabCon will accept anything other than staying in is when they realise that they will be voted out of office unless they follow the will of the people.
Treaties have consequences, like elections used to in the UK.