EU ‘relationship’ Bullshit Bingo

For those avid players of Bullshit Bingo, we have had a plethora of bovine turd flooding the airwaves and column inches today from a number of Tory tribalists which would have enabled many of you to shout ‘Chateau! at your game cards.  Taking the topics in turn…

Trust in politicians

Gavin Barwell led the way in today’s game with his appearance on BBC Radio 4 Today where he said he would be voting for the amendment to the Queen’s Speech.  His rational was that the vote:

… isn’t an issue about Conservative MPs trusting David Cameron.  It is about using the legislative process to convince the electorate that the clear commitment he gave in his speech in January is going to happen. What we need to do is convince the sceptical electorate that we actually mean it. I think a very effective way of doing that would be bringing forward legislation, so we can go back to our constituents and say look, if you vote Conservative at the next election, here is a guarantee that we will get a referendum.

Presumably little Gavin was out of radio contact when Cast Iron Dave dropped his promise for a referendum on the Lisbon  Treaty, and again in 2010 when Cameron was asked about holding a referendum and opened his response thus:

I do not believe in an in-out referendum for many reasons. I think we are better off in the European Union…

Well Gav, what’s not to trust?

Cameron gets results in ‘Europe’

Tory MEP Martin Callanan, speaking on BBC Radio 4 PM this evening, argued that David Cameron is right to try to renegotiate the UK’s ‘relationship with the EU’ and that Lord Lawson’s claim that any deal Cameron might strike would be ‘inconsequential’ was wrong.  Referring back to the Trust in Politicians line taken by Barwell, he tried to suggest people didn’t trust Labour or the Lib Dems, while pretending Cast Iron Dave had not dropped his own promise to give voters a say on the Lisbon Treaty.

Callanan’s evidence that Cameron could renegotiate a good deal with the EU?  To paraphrase… apparently Cameron has shown he can get results in ‘Europe’ because of his success in reducing the EU budget.  Stop laughing at the back.  Yes, that’s right, this is the same EU Budget coup Cameron supposedly pulled off, that is about to be circumvented as EU finance ministers prepare to vote through extra contributions anyway.  As an EU official succinctly explained last week:

Britain cannot get a blocking minority of countries to stop the first €7.3 billion (£6.2bn) tranche of the €11.2bn the European Commission needs.

There is nothing the British government can do about it as the annual budgets are agreed by majority voting.

Yet despite this being common knowledge, Callanan deceitfully attempted to maintain the budget deal myth to talk up Cameron’s ability to get things done when dealing with the EU as part of the effort to hold the line on the faux renegotiation scam.

Callanan also took the new line rapidly being adopted by Europlastic Tories that if a referendum was being held tomorrow he would likely vote to leave, shamelessly trying to convince us he would vote himself off the gravy train and out of his luxurious Brussels pad! As if.  Clearly the plan of the Eurosceptics is to declare they would leave tomorrow, so in the event of a Cameron-led renegotiation that resulted in nothing of any benefit to the UK, they could all rush to declare a fundamental change and that we should remain firmly in the EU.

‘Breaking off’ the ‘relationship’ with the EU

The UK remaining firmly in the EU is the stated wish of one half of the Axis of Weasel, Barack Obama.  In between Barwell and Callanan’s appearance on BBC Radio, we were treated to the fortune cookie wisdom of the Chicago community organiser.

While graciously acknowledging that it was for the British people to decide the matter of EU membership – which is more than the other half of the Axis of Weasel, aka Cast Iron Dave, has been prepared to accept – he went on to lie that being subsumed into the EU and denied our own voice in international affairs and trade negotiations, is an “expression” of the UK’s global influence!  Doublespeak is alive and kicking in the White House.  Obama observed his view that Cameron’s:

basic point that you probably want to see if you can fix what is broken in a very important relationship before you break it off – that makes some sense to me.

This of course is complete manure.  Nothing is broken.  The EU is functioning exactly as intended, accumulating ever greater control while neutering nation states and dismantling every vestige of democratic accountability and avenues for people to influence and dictate the direction of government.  And of course, ceasing to be ruled from Brussels does not mean the UK and other member states would cease to trade, cooperate and support each other.

The language is purposely designed to give the impression that leaving the EU signals these isles would figuratively move away from the continental land mass and float off into the Atlantic, exiled and isolated.  Independence, it seems, is to be feared and dismissed for our own good…

Throwing in the Towel

With the odor of dung hanging heavy in the air, it was over to Cameron himself to add to the pungent aroma of stage-managed theatrics.

He called the position held on EU withdrawal by former cabinet ministers Lord Lawson and Michael Portillo ‘very, very strange’.  Presumably he feels every Tory should be in lockstep behind his efforts to bribe voters with a stitched up referendum if only they will consent to him remaining in Downing Street for an additional five years of inactivity, inertia, handwringing, excuses, mismanagement, patronage, debt, erosion of liberty and expansion of state power.

Cameron accused Conservatives wanting to leave the European Union of ‘throwing in the towel’ before negotiations had even started.  Only the most ignorant and delusional of people could kid themselves that they alone can reform the EU and reverse its essential core pillar – that of ever closer union, which entails ever more power surrendered by member states to the Brussels bureaucracy.

One would have thought that on the eve of the extent of Cameron’s impotence being revealed to all, when the EU finance ministers torpedo his supposed victory over the EU budget, he would show a bit more humility and re-engage with reality.  But the great con must go on.  The act must be played out to its conclusion and events in the real world must not be allowed to shatter the illusion that he has carefully created within the political bubble.

Media collusion

We can’t cover these steaming piles of bullshit without a special mention for the other enemy within, our fearless media.

Not once has any journalist pointed out the yawning chasm of difference between the EU and the single market, which are conflated by the europhiles as being one and the same – despite the fact leaving the political union does not automatically mean the UK cannot be part of the single market.

Not once has any journalist asked for an explanation about why it is necessary for national sovereignty and political power to be given up in return for ‘benefits’ that can be enjoyed just as easily through simple treaties.

Not once has any journalist mentioned Article 50 or explained its significance, much less asked for Cameron to explain why he won’t invoke it and makes no mention of it.

Not once has any journalist challenged Cameron to justify his tag of being an ‘instinctive Eurosceptic’ when he is desperately opposing every eurosceptic move being made to bring forward a referendum.

Anyone would think they are being careful not to challenge the politicians too hard in case ordinary people start to, you know, think there is an alternative to being ruled with no good reason by the BBC’s Brussels-based benefactor.

7 Responses to “EU ‘relationship’ Bullshit Bingo”


  1. 1 james higham 14/05/2013 at 8:00 am

    Callanan’s evidence that Cameron could renegotiate a good deal with the EU? To paraphrase… apparently Cameron has shown he can get results in ‘Europe’ because of his success in reducing the EU budget.

    We put up a series of posts a few years back showing in detail why EU powers can never be repatriated, have never been. It’s either a lack of knowledge of the Davites or else subterfuge.

  2. 2 Autonomous Mind 14/05/2013 at 8:18 am

    It’s subterfuge, James. A naked con.

  3. 3 BulloPill 14/05/2013 at 8:41 am

    The only time Cameron & Co will graciously permit us humble subjects to have an In/Out referendum on EU Membership would be when there is certainty that we could be gulled into an “In” vote. Cameron & Co are fully seized of the vile EU project and fully intend that this once great and great nation should be consumed into Eurasia. Or is that Oceania this week?

  4. 4 grahamwood32 14/05/2013 at 9:13 am

    AM Good post and analysis of the reality. The EU “referendum” saga for the Tory party moves from comedy to farce leaving Cameron in effect friendless, detached from reality, and responsible for the return to trench warfare within his party – yet again.
    Could ANYONE really believe a guy who has now left himself a complete hostage to fortune by “promising a referendum in 2017?.
    He could just as well have said 2050!
    Quite apart from losing all credibility with the electorate who do not care over much about next week in political terms, let alone next year or the distant 2017, there are two obvious fault lines in Camerons deception – namely. His “pledge” is undeliverable as it is predicated on his return to power and in the PM’s seat. No chance!
    Secondly, it is undeliverable because his ‘promise’ would bind a future Parliament to a policy, and as we know full well no current parliament can bind a successor.
    Graham

  5. 5 StrongUnitedKingdom 14/05/2013 at 9:40 am

    Great article AM. Let us not forget the total lack of opposition from Labour “the official party of opposition”. As the Coalition is guilty by act Labour is guilty by omission.

  6. 6 Peter S 14/05/2013 at 1:35 pm

    We will see the “relationship” word rolled out again and again by the political class as Britain evaluates its connection to the EU.

    Fundamentally, Britain is NOT in a relationship with the EU as the dynamic of the connection is one of submission. Two or more parties must permit two types of interaction if their connection can be called a “relationship”. That is: the right of one party to refuse a demand made by the other, and, the right to negotiate all demands made within the group.

    Clearly, as the British political class has wilfully abandoned these interactions with the EU, its connection to that foreign tyranny can in no way be identified as a relationship. Instead, it is one of dumb functionality… as a machine slavishly responding to the will of its operator.

    The ONLY way Britain can have a relationship to the EU is by withdrawing completely from it. That is the ONLY position from which the refusals, the negotiations (and of course, the agreements) which define a relationship – ANY relationship – are possible.

    We might understand the dire mess Britain and Europe is in as the political incomprehension of this basic fact of life. Just as we might also know our greatest ever leaders never lost sight of it and used it as the surest guide of their course.

  7. 7 Autonomous Mind 14/05/2013 at 2:34 pm

    You’re right Peter. One cannot have a relationship with oneself. We are – regrettably – part of the beast, therefore we cannot by definition have a relationship with it.


Comments are currently closed.



Enter your email address below

The Harrogate Agenda Explained

Email AM

Bloggers for an Independent UK

AM on Twitter

Error: Please make sure the Twitter account is public.

STOR Scandal

Autonomous Mind Archive