Syria intervention – have we learned nothing?

This blog has deliberately avoided any focus on the civil war in Syria.  But that blind eye to the conflict cannot be kept closed any longer because of the likelihood of some kind of formal western involvement in the war.

After weeks of ‘Concrete Willy’ Hague yapping at the door of the White House like a deranged Pomeranian, begging the Americans to support the ‘Free Syrian Army’ with materiel support, the US government has now decided that its ‘red line gamechanger’ on the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian regime has been crossed and that it will directly aid the rebels.

There is no way this ends pretty.  It is clear that the west has failed to learn a damn thing from previous ill-judged interventions and the needless fighting of proxy wars.

It’s bad enough there is a desire to provide arms, training and assistance to the Free Syrian Army (short of sending battalions to actually engage the Syrian forces and their allies).  The rebel side is badly fragmented with ineffective command and control and finds itself in bed with the very worst Sunni Islamist extremist elements, who hate the west with a passion and want to turn Syria into another Yemen before constructing a hardline Islamic state that would make what is quietly happening in Libya and Egypt look like amateur hour.  Weaponry sent to Bashar al-Assad’s opponents will inevitably fall into the hands of those who will gleefully turn them on the west, or Israel, at the first opportunity.

But making it that much worse is the small matter of US, British and French involvement inviting a violent response by Iranian backed Shi’ite terrorist groups, such as Hezbollah, which support Assad and are currently pushing the rebels back out of areas previously captured from Assad’s military.  It also sets us on collision course to a proxy war with Putin’s Russia, which is keen to re-assert itself as a major world power and sees proxies as the route to redeveloping its global influence in lieu of a re-strengthened military machine.

It won’t be the politicians who suffer the known consequences and known unknowns of involvement in a conflict that does not directly threaten us, but ordinary people who comprise the soft targets these terrorists prefer to target.

We don’t have any skin in this game and there is no need for us, the French or the Americans to get insert ourselves into the Syrian conflict.  It is insanity to hand over weapons to people who are already motivated to turn them on us, and it is insanity to provoke a possible hornet’s nest of terrorist activity directed against us and our interests by groups that currently leave us alone.

When the matter comes before the House of Commons, MPs must vote down the government’s request for permission to arm the rebels at the expense of British taxpayers, some of whom could end up victims of retaliation for our involvement.  We have no place in Syria’s conflict and should stay the hell out.

5 Responses to “Syria intervention – have we learned nothing?”


  1. 1 dellwilson 14/06/2013 at 12:14 pm

    I recommend Dinesh D’Souza’s recent books (The Roots of Obama’s Rage and Obama’s America) for help with understanding why President Obama does what he does. From D’Souza’s perspective, our President is motivated primarily by anti-colonialism. Therefore, these rebels are simply freedom-fighters being held down by a dictatorial regime set up and propped up as one of the last vestiges of the colonial era. It matters not where the rebels’ allegiances lie; even better that they don’t align and support continued English and American hegemony. Welcome to Obama’s America y’all.

  2. 2 Duke of Plazatoro 14/06/2013 at 4:04 pm

    I understand that a recruiting center has opened in Westminster for volunteers from the political class to join the Free Syrian Army in their noble cause. Rumor has it that Cameron and Hague were the first to enlist.Meanwhile French and American politicians are rushing to join their brave British allies.

  3. 3 Sackerson 14/06/2013 at 5:00 pm

    Do you believe the story that the Syrian government has used chemical weapons? I’d have thought they’d be at pains not to give the Americans etc an excuse.

  4. 4 Duke of Plazatoro 14/06/2013 at 6:36 pm

    Sackerson
    From the moment that Obama declared that the use of chemical weapons by Assad would be the trigger for US intervention, it became the duty of every “Rebel” to produce such evidence. I have no doubt that half of the labs in the middle east were devoted to producing tiny amounts of Sarin to give to the US as such evidence. Of Course!.

  5. 5 permex 14/06/2013 at 10:34 pm

    The answer to your question is: No.


Comments are currently closed.



Enter your email address below

The Harrogate Agenda Explained

Email AM

Bloggers for an Independent UK

AM on Twitter

Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

STOR Scandal

Autonomous Mind Archive