This is the kind of huge headline story you would expect to see splashed across the pages of the WWF website, Nature magazine and a Louise Gray article in the Telegraph. We keep reading how various species are clinging precariously to existence and that any further small change in their environment caused by gaseous emissions will finally do for them and tip them over the edge into extinction. I doubt that many climate campaigners ever thought they would see the Bearded Pachauri added to the endangered list, but that is what has happened. As we are learning:
…The Pachauri habitat deep in the IPCC is quickly being transformed and climate change is at the root of it. Observers are discovering that the IPCC is unable to support the survival of this bearded curiosity much longer. Despite regular well funded migrations to a variety of luxurious board rooms and conference halls around the world, and the donation of huge sums in grants and award of directorships, the delicate balance between error and fraud in the IPCC habitat of the Bearded Pachauri has been disturbed by a huge increase in emissions of deceitful hot air. The sheer concentration of this man made gas is considered responsible for dramatically changing the conditions in the Pachauri’s environment and doing so with far greater speed that any scientist had previously projected. A spokesman for the WWF told us that the loss of the Pachauri is almost certainly unavoidable: ‘Man is responsible for this. We should have dramatically reduced our emissions of deceitful hot air. Producers of lie gas, such as Gore Inc and GISS Corp should have curbed their emissions but they failed to do so and now the IPCC is incapable of supporting the Bearded Pachauri. It will be a defining loss…’
The problem for Rajendra Pachauri is that he compounds his lies because he is so caught up in a web of deceit. As The Times explains today, when Pachauri was asked whether he had deliberately kept silent about the Himalayan glacier error to avoid embarrassment at the Copenhagen conferfence, he said:
“That’s ridiculous. It never came to my attention before the Copenhagen summit. It wasn’t in the public sphere.”
However The Times has identified a journalist who said that he had asked Dr Pachauri about the 2035 error last November. Pallava Bagla, who writes for Science journal – and as EU Referendum points out ironically works for Pachauri’s chief media cheerleader NDTV – , said he had asked Dr Pachauri about the error. He said that Dr Pachauri had replied: “I don’t have anything to add on glaciers.” This is probably because Pachauri had previously dismissed a report by the Indian Government which said that glaciers might not be melting as much as had been feared. He described the report, which did not mention the 2035 error, as ‘voodoo science’. There is more of the exchange between Pachauri and Bagla reported in the Mail today.
The chickens are coming home to roost. Pachauri’s position is untenable. The IPCC is a discredited shambles. But even when Pachauri is finally shoved aside by the IPCC in a desperate attempt to regain some degree of authority on climate change matters, nothing will change. The problem is not a wayward IPCC Chairman freelancing a personal political agenda, using climate change as a vehicle to realise a huge transfer of wealth from the developed world to the rapidly developing world, and a dramatic reduction in our standard of living. The whole entity is made up of politicised activists doing the exact same thing.
Changing the figurehead will not change the structure or integrity of the ship. The SS IPCC might look a little different, but its crew and destination will remain the same. Even when Pachauri has finally been pushed, or discovers enough humility to jump, the battle against political agendas masquerading as environmentalism will need to continue. The battle against Pachauri is one to expose the reality of the situation for a worldwide public that has been deceived for so long. But in reality it is a battle against the whole IPCC and the small corrupt cabal of core scientists who produce ‘reports’ generated using cherry picked data, that are then used by thousands of others as the baseline in climate science. We have a long way to go to drain the IPCC swamp and see the truth that is well hidden below the surface.
Autonomous Mind 
The underlying problem is that the political leaders of every major country have tied themselves so closely to the climate change scam that if they did the decent thing and put Dr P out of his misery the political fall-out would be very difficult for them to handle. The last thing any of them want is loss of face and that would happen big time if they had to admit they’d been suckered by this issue for years. Rather than lance the boil that is Dr P the infection will be allowed to get worse for a while yet with each leader hoping one of the others will apply the coup de grace…meanwhile the public’s willingness to believe any of this tosh is rapidly fading away.
How quiet the climategate believers have been since Copenhagen. My sympathy does to those who truly believed this drivel told to them and even became ‘the faithful’ who could be relied upon to turn up to any event and stand in the cold for days.
As your first commenter says the politicians are now between a rock and a hard place. The best thing for the SNP to do would be for Alex Salmond to go public and say we’ve all been duped but Scotland still believes in renewable energy as the science does prove that polution is our enemy and as we are the cause then we must provide the solution.
This spoof of climate science may be of interest:
http://climaterealists.com/?id=4960
The politicians and bureaucrats who have staked their reputations to this onerous lump of polluted science, an the ex scientists who sold their souls for some funding should all get what they deserve, apart from some who have leaped willfully into the realms of treason, they should all be dissmissed for gross miss-conduct, no severance pay, no pension just let go with their skin intact and all of them must go on an “unfit to serve” list, Gore, Obama, Brown Mann etc, etc. The realms of those who have their snouts in the taxpyers trough need culling badly, this is the time to do it, how many taxpayers will shed a tear for the public servants loss of a $100000 a year admin job that a $30000 a year office worker could do better?? this and stop giving our money to the UN and the deficits will go damn quick.