The most potent weapon in the media’s arsenal deployed against the public

On Radio 4’s Today programme this morning was an interview with former Sun editor, David Yelland.  He was talking about his views on press regulation and the Royal Charter, attacking the press for their reaction to the output from the Leveson inquiry.

While it was an interesting take on matters, focused on the Leveson Anniversary Lecture he is delivering today at the Free Word Centre and covered in the Guardian today, one small snippet of his speech that he shared on air stood out as being an invaluable insight from a heavyweight media insider:

One of the most potent weapons a newspaper has is to totally ignore an issue or a story. People attack papers for what they print. But what they don’t print is often the bigger story.

This is essential for people to understand.

For campaigns such as those concerned with leaving the EU, challenging climate change orthodoxy, demanding democratic reform, exposing abuses and failings of the establishment and so on, this  bias by omission is all too familiar and occurs all too frequently.  Another example of it has surfaced today.  It is invariably a weapon deployed in the interest of the media itself – but most frequently in support of agendas in the interest of the political class (which the media relies on for stories) and the rest of the establishment.  This cosy little stitch up, by and for people who consider themselves important, is designed to keep people in ignorance and conceal truths that are inconvenient to the establishment.

While this and many other blogs have often pointed at instances of bias by omission in favour of the establishment, very rarely does a member of it break ranks like this and admit the truth in such a transparent and matter of fact way.  Yelland reinforces the reality with another observation, thus:

[…] Whether they are mad or just lack self-awareness, the fact is editors and proprietors in this country see themselves as the small guy, the powerless man struggling against the establishment. What they fail to grasp is that they have become the establishment themselves. They are the powerful, and others are the weak.

He also confirms the pack mentality and derivative nature of the media – which while focused in this instance on the reaction to Leveson, equally applies to just about every major issue covered (or ignored) by this country’s press:

The press has done itself no favours in the biased way this entire matter has been reported, when it has been reported at all. Few papers have dared differ from the fundamental response to the great mess that caused the Leveson inquiry in the first place. There is a party line. And nearly everybody follows it.

The media cannot be relied upon.  Every story that is published needs to be viewed through a filter where one should ask themself; why has this story been covered, whose interest is being served, what is the other point of view, how and why were those providing comment selected, and what information has been excluded from the story?

It may seem cynical to do this, but it is the only way to shield oneself from the cynical manipulation to which the public is subjected by the press, be it broadcast, print or electronic.

6 Responses to “The most potent weapon in the media’s arsenal deployed against the public”


  1. 1 angela ellis-jones 29/11/2013 at 2:47 pm

    The Press ignored UKIP until it could no longer do so.The BBC still tries to ignore it,so far as it can.If UKIP had gained a lot more publicity since its foundation in 1993,we would probably be out of the EU by now!

  2. 2 robertday154 29/11/2013 at 4:32 pm

    The BBC ignoring UKIP? How many times has Nigel Farage been on Question Time this year? Fifteen? That’s more than any other individual! (Vince Cable for the LibDems, Ken Clarke for the Conservatives and Caroline Flint for Labour have each been on 13 times; most others only manage one or two appearances.)

  3. 3 Pogle's Woodsman 29/11/2013 at 5:06 pm

    As per the title heading your article commenting on a piece by Booker some months ago.

    It’s news management on behalf of political patronage.

    I’ve said it before and this is my genuine opinion. There’s no easier way to keep the press on side when it’s you giving out the gongs at the New Year’s honours list.

  4. 4 Brian H 30/11/2013 at 4:38 am

    There needs to be a paper whose motto is “All the News That’s Unfit to Print”, with a focus on reports the Consensus spikes.

  5. 5 spanows 30/11/2013 at 9:06 am

    The BBC ignoring UKIP? How many times has Nigel Farage been on Question Time this year? Fifteen? That’s more than any other individual! (Vince Cable for the LibDems, Ken Clarke for the Conservatives and Caroline Flint for Labour have each been on 13 times; most others only manage one or two appearances.)

    OK Robert, now add up the OTHER Labour, Conservative or Lib Dem appearances and compare it to the OTHER UKIP appearances…

    Re the post, another reason why it is absolutely essential to get one’s news from a variety of sources and a variety with differing ‘political leanings’.


  1. 1 A potent Weapon | UKIP Hillingdon Trackback on 29/11/2013 at 1:09 pm
Comments are currently closed.



Enter your email address below

The Harrogate Agenda Explained

Email AM

Bloggers for an Independent UK

AM on Twitter

Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

STOR Scandal

Autonomous Mind Archive